home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July / EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso / lightwave / lwmlist / 96.lightwave-0122 / 000748_dwarner@webcom.com _Wed Jan 31 19:26:27 1996.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  1996-02-03  |  1KB
  1. Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id TAA10165 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 19:26:25 -0500 (EST)
  2. Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
  3.     (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA060784537; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:28:57 -0800
  4. Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:28:57 -0800
  5. Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
  6. Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960131191735.14190A-100000@access4.digex.net>
  7. Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
  8. Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
  9. Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
  10. Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
  11. Precedence: bulk
  12. From: Ernie Wright <erniew@access.digex.net>
  13. To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
  14. Subject: Re: Focus Target
  15. X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
  16. Status: RO
  17. X-Status: 
  18.  
  19. Sean Cunningham wrote:
  20.  
  21. > On a different note, in the current release, the FOV numbers returned
  22. > look inaccurate.  Comparing the numbers in lightwave with corresponding 
  23. > values in the lens tables found in the Cinematographers handbook show 
  24. > that the aspect ratio of your FOV should match the aspect ratio of your 
  25. > aperture and your image, and they don't.  
  26.  
  27. Do you mean that the horizontal FOV divided by the vertical FOV should
  28. be the equal to the image aspect?
  29.  
  30. - Ernie